<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Composer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dealdotcom.com/blog/2008/10/10/content-composer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dealdotcom.com/blog/2008/10/10/content-composer/</link>
	<description>Just another DealDotCom weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pnisbet</title>
		<link>http://www.dealdotcom.com/blog/2008/10/10/content-composer/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>pnisbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dealdotcom.com/blog/?p=510#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>I have never yet seen article-writing software (of which I own 3) that produces articles that look good without extensive editing, other than simply permutating different versions of the title, paragraphs, summary and resources.  There are submission sites that do the latter for you, free of charge, one of which I am a member.

Also, your comments about ghost writers are offensive, and if you are stupid enough to employ ghost writers that can't do their job without first testing their worth with free samples that doesn't give much confidence in your product. I always offer prospective customers a professionally written article for approval of my style prior to accepting any contract from them - everybody should do the same, or demand it if it is not offered.  

It is never good to bad-mouth (bad pen?) other professionals without naming the individuals concerned. Or is it an impression or unfounded opinion, or perhaps based on Elance and some of the jokers there? I sympathise with you on that. 

Nevertheless, I have an open mind and am willing to be persuaded. I am so busy writing for others that I have no time to keep the content on my own thirty odd websites fresh: so what makes this so different that makes it worth such a high price? 

I can afford to purchase any product if it will either make me money or save me time, and am quite prepared to help in your search for fame if you acn do the same for me.

Cheers,

Pete
article-services.com
pete@article-services.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never yet seen article-writing software (of which I own 3) that produces articles that look good without extensive editing, other than simply permutating different versions of the title, paragraphs, summary and resources.  There are submission sites that do the latter for you, free of charge, one of which I am a member.</p>
<p>Also, your comments about ghost writers are offensive, and if you are stupid enough to employ ghost writers that can&#8217;t do their job without first testing their worth with free samples that doesn&#8217;t give much confidence in your product. I always offer prospective customers a professionally written article for approval of my style prior to accepting any contract from them - everybody should do the same, or demand it if it is not offered.  </p>
<p>It is never good to bad-mouth (bad pen?) other professionals without naming the individuals concerned. Or is it an impression or unfounded opinion, or perhaps based on Elance and some of the jokers there? I sympathise with you on that. </p>
<p>Nevertheless, I have an open mind and am willing to be persuaded. I am so busy writing for others that I have no time to keep the content on my own thirty odd websites fresh: so what makes this so different that makes it worth such a high price? </p>
<p>I can afford to purchase any product if it will either make me money or save me time, and am quite prepared to help in your search for fame if you acn do the same for me.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Pete<br />
article-services.com<br />
<a href="mailto:pete@article-services.com">pete@article-services.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
